Reading Time: 10 minutes

The Queen meets the so-called "Vicar of Christ" for the first time.

The late Queen Elizabeth II was loved around the world. She may indeed have been a good person when judged by the standards of morality of the world at large. Some people, however, have accused the Queen of atrocious crimes! Dr. John Coleman says the Queen was the head of an elite conspiratorial ruling body he called “The Committee of 300”. We shouldn’t go by the testimonial of a single person because the Bible tells us we need at least two witnesses to confirm a matter. I think Coleman was probably a disinformation agent. He received no opposition or persecution for his message, and his book, CONSPIRATORS’ HIERARCHY: THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300 can be downloaded from the CIA’s official website! LOL!

This article, therefore, is not accusing the Queen of any wrongdoing, but to question whether she really knew the Lord Jesus as her Savior and as the Son of God, the Word that became flesh.

Nearly all my friends believe that the Queen was a real Christian in spite of the fact she was honored by the entire mostly Christ-rejecting world! I think it’s important to have a balanced view of who she really was.

I definitely don’t think any of her children are Christians! King Charles is a globalist who works with the World Economic Forum and is buddies with the evil Klaus Schwab. He pushes the false narrative of human-induced climate change. Princess Margaret was an alcoholic and a hedonist. Her main goal in life appeared to be one of only seeking pleasure. Prince Andrew was accused of pedophilia. Prince Edward’s sexuality has been questioned throughout the years. And her husband, Prince Philip, is not known as being a very nice guy.

The rest of this article is a partial repost of an article on https://crossroad.to entitled:

Freemasonry and the British Monarchy Why the Queen of England Pretends to be a Christian by Jeremy James

It was written before the Queen passed away.

The Queen as Supreme Governor of the Church of England

The Elite are not atheists or agnostics, as they often pretend. Neither are they Christian, as some of their most prominent members would have us believe. Rather, they are profoundly committed to the old religion. This is the ancient system of pantheism, Gnosticism and idolatry which rejects the LORD God of the Bible and is generally identified in the public mind with the worship of pagan deities. In short, the people who rule this world are not simply indifferent to Christianity, but reject it completely.

Officially, the Queen is a member of the Church of England, an Anglican convocation similar to the Lutheran church in Germany or the Episcopalian in the United States. She was baptized at five weeks by the Archbishop of York in Buckingham Palace on 26 May, 1926. Under British law, as reigning monarch, she is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. All members of the British royal family are officially affiliated with the Anglican Church, but not one of them has ever been known to testify to the atoning power of the blood of Christ. Indeed, it is doubtful whether any influential member of the British ruling class is a Bible-believing Christian.

The Anglican Church is the official state religion or Established Church of England. Having been under the covert control of the ruling elite almost from its inception, it is the principal means by which true Christianity in England has been suppressed. Through its empty formalism and shallow doctrines, its seasonal ritual and genteel pageantry, it offers a comforting substitute for true Biblical Christianity. In order to keep the commoners and lower classes in thrall, the nobility themselves profess to be Anglican and participate in certain annual services.

Behind the scenes, however, the ruling elite have for centuries been freemasons, atheists or Unitarians. They all reject the deity of Christ. The Anglican church has long been primarily a system of social control whereby the rich and powerful maintain their privileged positions and at the same time imbue the masses with the mindless patriotism that is needed to run an Empire.

Paganism and the Royal Family

Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth, was initiated into Freemasonry at Navy Lodge No 2612, London, on December 5, 1952:

“Present at the initiation were the Earl of Scarborough, grand master…and Geoffrey Fisher, archbishop ofCanterbury. The lodge has many ties with the royal family as King EdwardVII served as its first master in 1896 when he was Prince of Wales. KingGeorge VI…served as master when he was Duke of York. In 1928 H.R.H. Duke of Kent…was master and later became grand master of the GrandLodge of England.” – William Denslow,10,000 Famous Freemasons, 1957.

There is more than enough information on record to prove beyond all doubt that the British royal family is not Christian but pagan. The Prince of Wales  – the Queen’s eldest son [Charles] – is a well-known advocate of New Age philosophy and paranormal science. Numerous members of the royal family down the years, including Queen Victoria, attended séances where professional mediums channeled ‘messages’ from demonic source. They have also availed routinely of the services of psychic healers and paranormal advisors. Prince Charles himself was counseled for many years by the shamanic fantasist, Laurens van der Post.

We will shortly demonstrate that the Queen too is a non-believer. Her membership of the Anglican church is immaterial. What matters is whether or not she openly professes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that she has accepted him into her heart as Lord and Savior. The evidence clearly shows that she has not.

It may seem strange that the official head of the Church of England is a not a Christian, but it is doubtful whether any senior cleric in the Church of England is a Christian. It is virtually impossible to advance into a position of influence in the English system of social-political control without being a Freemason, a Unitarian or someone who has otherwise demonstrated his or her rejection of both the deity of Christ and the authority of Scripture. There are bound to be exceptions, of course, but they are few and have little practical bearing on how the system operates.

For example, we have already noted that the Archbishop of Canterbury was present at the induction of Prince Philip into Freemasonry, while the current incumbent, Rowan Williams – like each of his predecessors during the 20th century – rejects the account of Creation given in the Bible, and has even expressed the view that it should not be taught in schools as an alternative to Evolution.

In Her Own Words

Instead of drawing on secondary sources or informed reports, we will confine ourselves to the Queen’s own words. Among the best primary sources of evidence about her real beliefs is the set of Christmas Messages that she has delivered annually since her coronation in 1952.

Given that these messages are delivered on a major feast day in the Christian calendar, by a professing Christian, to a primarily Christian audience, one would expect at least some of them to give a clear endorsement of her Christian faith. There are 59 messages in all, comprising a total of 43,000 words, and yet nowhere in any of them dowe find a clear reference to the deity of Christ. In fact, as we shall shortly see, we find the very opposite, namely a consistent portrayal of Jesus as nothing more than a well-meaning, peace-loving idealist who wanted to make this world a better place.

It is truly remarkable that, over a sixty year period, the official head of the Anglican Church has failed to make even a single statement that would demonstrate her belief in the most basic doctrine of Christianity, namely the deity of Christ.

Before we proceed to examine her words in detail, we need to consider the general attitude of the British aristocracy toward the person of Christ. As we have seen, this has been shaped in the main by Freemasonry, Gnosticism, and Unitarian theology, all of which deny his deity, his substitution atonement, and the inerrancy of the Bible. They regard him merely as a good man who had a talent for healing and preaching.

The Unitarian/Masonic Christ is very similar to the New Age Christ, a guru-type figure possessing a more elevated or spiritual state of consciousness than the average man.

For centuries Freemasons have stealthily but aggressively promoted a humanistic message which they express as two principles with universal application – the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God. By this they mean that all men, regardless of their religious affiliation, are of equal spiritual standing, both in relation to each other and in relation to God. As it happens these same beliefs also figure prominently in the New Age movement.

Taken together these principles are proclaiming that the Bible is wrong when it makes an absolute distinction between believers and unbelievers, between those who are saved and those who are lost. Freemasonry and the New Age movement completely reject original sin, the fallen state of man, and the need for redemption through the saving blood of Christ. In their view, man is not lost but continually evolving through experience into a higher spiritual state.

The Queen’s definition of Christ

From a study of her Christmas Messages we find that the Queen’s portrayal of Christ differs little, if at all, from theMasonic/New Age Christ, namely, a holy man – and nothing but a man – who tried to teach the people of his time the importance of kindness and tolerance, that we are all one human family, and that we should live together in peace and harmony. This definition places him on a par with men like Mahatma Gandhi and Albert Schweitzer, Bishop Tutu and the Dalai Lama. And as flattering as this might seem to the average atheist or humanist, it is an appalling distortion of reality.

The first point to note is that, although she was (and still is) the official head of the Established church in England, the Queen made no reference whatever to Christ by name in her annual Christmas Messages during the first 20 years of her reign! Not one. Why not search the file yourself to confirm this? A complete compilation of the Queen’s Christmas messages may be found at:http://www.scribd.com/doc/93046264/Christmas-Messages-by-Queen-Elizabeth-II.

The same material is also available in serial form on her official website:http://www.royal.gov.uk. Perhaps her advisors realized that such an attitude was bound eventually to attract adverse attention. In any event, she finally made her first reference in 1973:

“Christ taught love and charity and that we should show humanity and compassion at all times and in all situations."

When read in context, this otherwise innocent statement can be seen to sit neatly with the Masonic brotherhood-of-man philosophy:

"I believe that Christmas should remind us that the qualities of the human spirit are more important than material gain. Christ taught love and charity and that we should show humanity and compassion at all times and in all situations…. A lack of humanity and compassion can be very destructive – how easily this causes divisions within nations and between nations. We should remember instead how much we have in common and resolve to give expression to the best of our human qualities, not only at Christmas, but right through the year.” (1973)

Two years later she made her second reference to Christ, but this time she didn’t even bother to refer to him by name:

"We are celebrating a birthday – the birthday of a child born nearly2,000 years ago, who grew up and lived for only about 30 years. That one person, by his example and by his revelation of the good which is in us all, has made an enormous difference to the lives of people who have come to understand his teaching.” (1975)

Note that the teaching of Christ is described as “his revelation of the good which is in us all”. But this is completely false! The Bible teaches the very opposite. Christ came to save man from his wretched, fallen state and not to reveal “the good that is in us all” – since the Bible clearly teaches that there is none!["I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells…" Romans7:18]

It is ironic that, in the same breath, she refers to people “who have come to understand his teaching”, and yet she doesn’t seem to understand it herself.

Note the blasphemous incorporation of the Ark of the Covenant. Both through his words and through his actions, Christ confirmed the basic message that runs through the entire Bible, namely, that man in his natural state [apart from Christ] is a fallen, sin-filled being, blindly headed for eternal damnation. So which philosophy is the Queen actually citing, that of the Bible or that of Freemasonry?

Two years later she made another brief reference to the person whom her words were meant to honour. This too was in the ‘holy man’ mould:

"Christians have the compelling example of the life and teaching of Christ and, for myself, I would like nothing more than that my grandchildren should hold dear his ideals which have helped and inspired so many previous generations.” (1977)

Note that it is his ideals that she holds dear –not his deity, his resurrection, or his redemption of mankind.

The Masonic Parliament of Man

Following a brief reference to “the birth of the child who transformed history and gave us a great faith” (1979), she quoted liberally in 1980 from a peculiar poem by Tennyson which referred to “the” Christ. This is highly suggestive since Tennyson was also the author of a poem, Locksley Hall, which was well known (and well understood) by the luminaries of Victorian England.

They knew that Tennyson rejected Christianity and drew his inspiration exclusively from pagan authors. These included the pantheist, Baruch Spinoza, and the eminent occult philosopher, Giordano Bruno. He was also a member of an exclusive secret society at Cambridge, known as the Cambridge Apostles, which was audaciously non-Christian in outlook.

Locksley Hall contains one of the most celebrated statements of the Masonic vision of a New World Order:

For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,
Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be;
Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain’d a ghastly dew
From the nations’ airy navies grappling in the central blue; …
Till the war-drum throbb’d no longer, and the battle-flags were furl’d
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world.

He envisaged a parliament of man, a federation of the world. These words have been quoted many times by top Freemasons and key players in the long-range plan to create a unified World Government, a parliament of man. Tennyson’s poem was greatly admired by leading architects of the New World Order, Winston Churchill and Harry Truman, while Andrew Carnegie, one of the richest men in America in the 19thcentury and a high-ranking member of the Ruling Elite, wrote in Triumphant Democracy (1893):

“The Parliament of Man and the Federation ofthe World have already been hailed by the poet, and these mean a step muchfarther in advance of the proposed reunion of Britain and America.”

Note his final words – a step much farther in advance of the proposed reunion of Britain and America.

Reunion of Britain and America? Yes, and more, as Carnegie says, a step much farther in advance of that. So when a reigning British monarch quotes a poem by Tennyson, we should pay close attention. Here are the verses she quoted (from Ring Out, Wild Bells):

Given that Tennyson had no regard for Christianity, theChrist figure to whom he refers is clearly not Biblical. Christians seldom, if ever, put a definite article before Christ because there is only one Christ, but Freemasons, gnostics and pagans often refer to ‘the Christ’ since they regard it as a cosmic or celestial office separate from the one who holds it.

In their occult philosophy, the Freemasons envisage the future incarnation in human form of their Angel of Light – known variously as Apollo, Horus, Helios, Lucifer, etc– whom they will enthrone and honour as their Messiah in their long-planned federation of the world. This is “the Christ that is to be” in Tennyson’s poem, though born-again Christians will recognize him as the Antichrist.

Did the Queen realize the significance of this? Given that the royal family has been a patron and protector of Freemasonry in Britain for generations, it would astonishing if she didn’t. Her consistent espousal of the brotherhood-of-man-fatherhood-of-god philosophy demonstrates her familiarity with the tenets of Freemasonry, which includes a belief in the arrival of a Messiah-type figure once the New World Order has been established. (This is the true meaning of the catchphrase, ‘If you build it, he will come,’ from the sugar-coated occult movie, Fields of Dreams.)

The Masonic Trivialization of Christianity

Her Christmas Message the following year, 1981, included the following:

"Our Christian faith helps us to sustain those convictions. Christ not only revealed to us the truth in his teachings. He lived by what he believed and gave us the strength to try to do the same – and, finally, on the cross, he showed the supreme example of physical and moralcourage. That sacrifice was the dawn of Christianity and this is why at Christmas time we are inspired by the example of Christ as we celebrate his birth.” (1981)

Even though she takes a seemingly bold step and mentions the cross, it is immediately neutralised by two references to Christ as an ‘example’. According to Masonic philosophy, the Cross of Calvary achieved nothing. As the Queen says, it was just an example of exceptional moral courage and something that should inspire us. This is a patent trivialization of Christianity, where the whole basis of our faith is reduced to a courageous symbolic act, an inspiring example, but certainly not the atoning work of the incarnate Son of God for the sins of mankind.

The following year, Her Majesty took the opportunity to inject even more Masonic philosophy into her message. In three short paragraphs she managed to depict Christianity as just one of many “religious groups” in the world today and to equate the Christian message with “the Commonwealth” – meaning the common weal or common good:

“At this time of the year, Christians celebrate the birth of their Saviour, but no longer in an exclusive way. We hope that our greetings at Christmas to all people of religious conviction and goodwill will be received with the same understanding that we try to show in receiving the greetings ofother religious groups at their special seasons."

The poet John Donne said: ‘No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, apart of the main.’ That is the message of the Commonwealth and it is also the Christian message. Christ attached supreme importance to the individual and he amazed the world in which he lived by making it clear that the unfortunate andthe underprivileged had an equal place in the Kingdom of Heaven with therich and powerful. But he also taught that man must do his best to live in harmony with man and to love his neighbors.” (1982)

The brotherhood-of-man-fatherhood-of-god philosophy is clearly evident in these paragraphs. Freemasons and members of the New Age movement are fond of Donne’s little phrase, “No man is an island”. It fits perfectly with the parliament of man idea in Freemasonry and the all is one principle that features so prominently in the New Age movement.

Note also the careful way she distances herself from Christianity and any suggestion that she might actually be a Christian – “At this time of the year, Christians celebrate the birth of their Saviour, but no longer in an exclusive way." The latter words, “but no longer in an exclusive way”, are designed to reinforce the idea that truth is not exclusive to Christianity but may be found in many different religious traditions.

Again, with shameless candour, a central tenet of Freemasonry is fed to the nation on prime-time television by the official head of the Anglican church. The common spiritual source of all religious traditions was again emphasized in the year 2000 when she said:

"This spirituality can be seen in the teachings of other great faiths. Of course religion can be divisive, but the Bible, the Koran and the sacred texts of the Jews and Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs, are all sources of divine inspiration and practical guidance passed down through the generations.” (2000)

If she was really a Christian the Queen would know that the Koran and the religious writings of the Hindus and Buddhists were not divinely inspired. She would also know that they reject outright the divinity of Christ. So, on a feast day that is supposed to recognize and honour the incarnation of Christ in human form, she boldly asserts the broad equivalence of all religious traditions, including those which reject the deity of Christ.

In an earlier Message (1986), she described Jesus as merely a simple person from lowly background who managed to affect the course of history:

"Christmas is a festival for all Christians, but it is particularly afestival for children. As we all know, it commemorates the birth of a child,who was born to ordinary people, and who grew up very simply in his ownsmall home town and was trained to be a carpenter. His life thus began in humble surroundings, in fact in a stable, but he was to have a profound influence on the course of history, and on the lives of generations of his followers. You don’t have to be rich or powerful in order to change things for the better and each of us in our own way can make a contribution.

"The infant Jesus was fortunate in one very important respect. His parents were loving and considerate. They did their utmost to protect him from harm. They left their own home and became refugees, tosave him from King Herod, and they brought him up according to thetraditions of their faith.” (1986)

His deity is completely erased. Instead we are presented with the image of a little boy who, because he was greatly loved by his mummy and daddy and raised “according tithe traditions of their faith”, succeeded in doing something useful with his life.

Note how the Old Testament, the Word of God, is described merely as “the traditions of their faith." This humanistic depiction of Christ was repeated in 2001:

“As a boy he learnt his father’s trade as a carpenter. He then became a preacher, recruiting twelve supporters to help him…His great emphasis was to give spirituality a practical purpose.” (2001)

So, there it is, the royal description of Jesus – a carpenter-preacher with a talent for highlighting the practical side of religion, a former child refugee who recruited twelve supporters and acquired generations of followers. In short, an unlikely social reformer who managed to make a difference in the lives of ordinary people. She could hardly have been more patronising without provoking adverse comment. In fact, it is a mark of the shallowness and hypocrisy of Anglican Christianity that such a demeaning portrait of Christ by the nation’s monarch could even be televised.

The Good Samaritan

Over a sixty year period the Queen mentioned only one episode from the Bible (other than the nativity) in her Christmas Messages, but she did so on three occasions – in1985, 1989 and 2004. This is the parable by Jesus of the Good Samaritan which tells of a traveler who stopped and helped an injured man by the roadside, and even brought him to a hostel to recover, while two respected members of the community passed him by and failed to offer any assistance.

The parable is presented by the Queen as though Jesus was endorsing the brotherhood-of-man–fatherhood-of-god philosophy. When taken out of context and given a Masonic slant, it seems to confirm that salvation is contingent upon good works and human conduct. However, a professing Christian with only a rudimentary knowledge of Scripture will know that this interpretation is false. There is nothing man can do of himself to save himself from the devastating consequences of original sin.

The ‘love’ taught in Freemasonry and the New Age movement is not he love we find in the Bible. Scripture teaches – in the strongest possible terms – that God’s love cannot touch and redeem man in his sinful, fallen state without the atoning work of Christ, and yet this is precisely what Freemasonry and the New Age movement reject!

The Queen confirmed her Masonic perception of love when she said:

"But these technical skills [invention, scientific progress] are not enough by themselves. They can only come to the rescue of the planet if we also learn to live by the golden rule which Jesus Christ taught us– "love thy neighbour as thyself".” (1989)

Here she is discussing environmental issues such as pollution of the rivers and seas. Incredibly, she equates the ‘love’ needed to ‘rescue’ the planet with the love that Jesus was speaking about, a love which has no meaning – and nopower – when divorced from his divinity and obedience to his Word.

Jesus did not teach ‘the golden rule’ of Freemasonry, as the Queen implies; rather he taught the commandments and precepts of the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel. These are vastly different from, and in fundamental conflict with, the morals and dogma of Freemasonry, a philosophy that flagrantly rejects the saving blood of Christ and his atoning sacrifice on the cross.

Man as an Animal Species

We are not dealing here with the simplifications that are sometimes necessary when presenting a message to a large and diverse audience. Rather, we are dealing with a very deliberate re-statement of Christianity along Masonic and New Age lines. If you still doubt this, then consider the following comment from the same Christmas Message:

“It’s not very difficult to apply that story [the Good Samaritan] to our own times and to work out that our neighbours are those of our friends, or complete strangers, who need a helping hand. Do you think they might also be some of the living species threatened by spoiled rivers, o some of the children in places like Ethiopia and Sudan who don’t have enough to eat?” (1989)

Prince Philip once stated during a televised documentary that humans are a “plague”on the planet. This implies that humans are just one of the many animal species living on earth today. It is obvious from her remark that his wife subscribes to the same materialistic philosophy. However, true Biblical Christianity completely rejects the popular idea that humans are an animal species. Man is made in the image and likeness of God. He is not an animal of any kind, but a unique creation.

Animals cannot sin, only man can sin. This is why Freemasonry, the New Age movement, and atheistic humanism subscribe so strongly to the theory of evolution or any similar theory that portrays man as just another animal species. If man is just an animal then he cannot sin, and if he cannot sin then he cannot be judged by God.

I am reminded here of an exhibition in central London in 2009 which was housed in he former church of the Holy Trinity, Marylebone. The event included an unusually blasphemous exhibit as its centre piece, namely a life-size waxen figure of a gorilla nailed to a large wooden cross. Despite receiving lively coverage in the national media, this obscene effigy – which was described in the press as a ‘crucified ape’ –was not condemned or even criticized by any prominent Church leader in Britain.

But should we be surprised? After all, the Masons, atheists and evolutionists who control the Anglican Church regard man as just another animal species. A Masonic restatement of the Christian Message One of her most Masonic, New Age and ecumenical renderings of the Christian message was given in 2001 when she quoted the words of a well-known hymn, but failed to include the most important part:

“I believe that the Christian message, in the words of a familiar blessing, remains profoundly important to us all: Go forth into the world in peace be of good courage, hold fast that which is good, render to no man evil for evil, strengthen the faint-hearted, support the weak, help the afflicted, honour all men.”

These words are from a benediction in the 1928 version of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer. While they are certainly edifying, they cannot be considered “the Christian message” in any meaningful sense. So what’s missing? See for yourself. Here is the complete version:

"Go forth into the world in peace. Be of good courage. Hold fast that which is good. Render to no man evil for evil. Strengthen the faint-hearted. Support the weak. Help the afflicted. Honor all men. Love and serve the Lord, rejoicing in the power of the Holy Ghost. And the blessing of God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, be upon you and remain with you forever. Amen."

Since the British royal family, like their counterparts across Europe, reject the deity of Christ, they also reject the Scriptures. They do not believe in the Triune God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel [Mark 12:26], but in a different god entirely. The Anglican benediction has no distinctively Christian element without the words which they Queen chose to omit. Her version does nothing more than encapsulate the interfaith morality and brotherhood-of-man philosophy of Freemasonry.

The version read on television by the Queen would be perfectly acceptable to a Hindu, Buddhist, or Moslem. Indeed, it would be acceptable even to an atheist or a humanist. So, to portray it as “the Christian message” is incredibly disingenuous, if not deceitful. She repeated her view that Christianity is in essence an ideology when, the following year, she said:

“Christmas is the anniversary of the birth of Christ over two thousand years ago, but it is much more than that. It isthe celebration of the birth of an idea and an ideal."

This is Masonic to the core. The birth of the Son of God, the Saviour of mankind, is reduced to “an idea and an ideal.” Marxism is an idea and an ideal. Humanism is an idea and an ideal. And yet the Queen sees fit to place Christianity on the same plane. It beggars belief. Here are just a few more occasions when she expressed a similar view:

“I wished to speak of it from New Zealand this Christmas Day because we are celebrating the birth of the Prince of Peace, who preached the brotherhood of man.” (1953)“ …the essential message of Christmas is still that we allbelong to the great brotherhood of man. This idea is not limited to the Christian faith. Philosophers and prophets have concluded that peace is better than war, love is better than hate and that mankind can only find progress in friendship and co-operation.” (1968)

“The scriptures and traditions of the other faiths enshrine the same fundamental guidance. It is very easy to concentrate on the differences between the religious faiths and to forget what they have in common – people of different faiths are bound together by the need to help the younger generation to become considerate and active citizens.” (2006)

“Perhaps it was because of this early experience that, throughout his ministry, Jesus of Nazareth reached out and made friends with people whom others ignored or despised. It was in this way that he proclaimed his belief that, in the end, we are allbrothers and sisters in one human family.” (2007)

In The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Manley Palmer Hall, who is widely respected by Freemasons as one of their supreme authorities, stated:

"The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth."

Masons reject Christ as "the way." As Hall says, “the name means little.”

However, as every true Christian knows, this is one of Satan’s greatest lies. The Word of God tells us that salvation is found only in the name of Jesus Christ:

 “And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ…” (1John 3:23); “…for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)

Here is how the Grand Lodge of Louisiana stated the Masonic position in their secret handbook:

"To the altar of Freemasonry all men bring their most votive offerings. Around it all men, whether they have received their teachings from Confucius, Zoroaster, Moses, Mohammed or the founder of the Christian religion – just so long as they believe in the universality of the fatherhood of God and universality of the brotherhood of man – meet upon a common level. The Jew returns to his synagogue, the Mohammedan to his mosque and the Christian to his temple – each better prepared for the solemn duties of life by the associations in this universal brotherhood." – Louisiana Monitor, 1980 [Emphasis added]

So, under the pretense that she is a Christian, the Queen is preaching the philosophy of  Freemasonry. The fact that her messages are couched in Christian terminology is irrelevant. Freemasonry does this all the time, packaging and disguising its ancient occult beliefs in a deceptive, vernacular form.

Conclusion

Christians need to understand that the people who rule this world are NOT Christian – though they often pretend to be. They worship another god and loath Christianity, Christ, the Cross of Calvary, the blood of the Lamb, the Resurrection, and the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel. They are busily preparing the scenario set out in the Book of Revelation, where their ‘messiah’ or godmantakes on human form and rules over the entire earth.

In order to make this possible they are working hard behind the scenes to create a unified global system of governance (‘If you build it, he will come’). Since their messiah has no power against Christ, they are also determined to radically reduce the number of true believers, chiefly by getting professing Christians to adopt a soft, New Age version of ‘Christianity’ which has no power to save.

The Power Elite controls much of Europe and North America through Freemasonry. However, many national and world leaders pretend to be Christian in order to retain the confidence of the public. Most Presidents of the United States during the past hundred years or so was a high-ranking Freemason or a member of a secret occult society.

For example, both George Bush senior and George Bush junior pretended to be Christians when in fact they were initiated members of theSociety of the Skull & Bones, a dark Luciferian fraternity based at Yale University. Thegod of Fremasonry is Lucifer, the Light Bearer, the beguiling ‘angel of light’ face that Satan presents to his acolytes. The British like to refer to him as Helios or Apollo, the sun god of Greek mythology.

The Queen of England may or may not adhere to all of the beliefs and doctrines of Freemasonry, but her Christmas Messages are profoundly Masonic. She clearly rejects the deity of Christ and cannot be regarded as a Christian. In reality, she is a senior member of a pagan ruling caste that is gradually bringing the world ever closer to a One World Government and a One World Religion.