“The Holy Bible” – By Darryl Eberhart
A wise society takes God’s Word as the basis for justice. Society is now witnessing the tragic consequences when men throw out God’s Word or simply ignore it.”
Textus Receptus
The Textual Controversy
My one object has been to defeat the mischievous attempt, which was made in 1881 to thrust upon this Church and Realm a revision of the Sacred Text, which recommended though it be by eminent names, I am thoroughly convinced, and am able to prove, is untrustworthy from beginning to end.
The Modern Versions – Origins and Influences
The 1881 committee that produced the Revised Version, the mother of the majority of today’s modem versions, was unimpressed with the weight of the evidence supporting the Received Text, which had been used for English translations by William Tyndale, John Rogers, and Miles Coverdale, as well as later by the 1611 translators.
The Proliferation of Modern “Bibles”
Modern translations of the New Testament that are not based on the Textus Receptus are not pure as the King James Version. They are based on corrupt manuscripts.
Reasons Why the King James Version is the Best English Translation of the Bible
The King James New Testament, alone of all the English translations, is based on the Greek text known as the Textus Receptus, which is the… Read More »Reasons Why the King James Version is the Best English Translation of the Bible
Traditional Text Line of the Bible Compared to the Alexandrian Text Line
Popular modern English Bible translations such as ASV, RSV, NIV, ESV are based on corrupt manuscripts from the Roman Catholic Church!