Posted on
41The correct interpretation of Daniel chapter 9 and especially verse 27 is extremely important because it is the ‘linchpin’ of all Bible prophecy. If you don’t get it right, your interpretation of other prophecies in the Book of Daniel, Matthew 24, II Thessalonians 2:3,4, and the Book of Revelation will also be wrong!
Continue reading →The history of the men of God who worked at the risk of their lives to translate and publish God’s Word in English.
Continue reading →God’s definition of effective is clearly revealed in Isaiah 55: 8 – For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.
Continue reading →Posted on
1The 1881 committee that produced the Revised Version, the mother of the majority of today’s modem versions, was unimpressed with the weight of the evidence supporting the Received Text, which had been used for English translations by William Tyndale, John Rogers, and Miles Coverdale, as well as later by the 1611 translators.
Continue reading →Posted on
5This article lists the 8 top selling Bible translations in the USA. The KJV is ranked number 2. Do they all teach the same things about the prophecy of the 70th Week of Daniel? I consider the correct translation of Daniel 9:27 to be of utmost importance. Why? It’s because most contemporary Protestant evangelicals believe the “he” of Daniel 9:27 is the Antichrist, a secular humanist who makes an Endtime … Continue reading →
Posted on
6What the original 1611 King James Bible looked like. A friend on social media shared with me a YouTube entitled, “AV1611 The True Bible” by John Doerr. In it, Mr. Doerr says, Throughout the 1800s you’ve got a number of attacks on Scripture. The most subtle would be the change of the authorized version of 1611 by a Vatican manuscript subscribing man named Benjamin Blayney who didn’t know any Hebrew. … Continue reading →
The Geneva Bible clearly points the finger at the Roman Catholic Church for being the woman and the whore of Revelation 17 and 18.
Continue reading →Albert Pike I was impressed by this article by James Whisler I found on https://historicist.info/articles/dts.htm and thought to repost the first part of it. The website is in need of repair. There are broken links to images and other technical errors. It must first be brought to the reader’s attention that the mystery religions, including Freemasonry, have employed symbolism as a form of communication. The hidden understanding of symbols was … Continue reading →
Posted on
5The King James New Testament, alone of all the English translations, is based on the Greek text known as the Textus Receptus, which is the Greek New Testament used during the spiritual awakenings of the Reformation period. Before the invention of printing, of course, the Scriptures were transmitted by hand copying and circulation. The generally acknowledged and accepted manuscripts were, of course, widely used and so wore out fairly quickly … Continue reading →
Posted on
22The Geneva Bible preceded the King James translation by 51 years. It was the primary Bible of 16th century Protestantism and was the Bible used by William Shakespeare, Oliver Cromwell, John Knox, John Donne, and John Bunyan, author of Pilgrim’s Progress. It was the first Bible ever that included chapter and verse numbers! All subsequent Bibles followed suit. In this post I am not saying I think the Geneva Bible … Continue reading →
Popular modern English Bible translations such as ASV, RSV, NIV, ESV are based on corrupt manuscripts from the Roman Catholic Church!
Continue reading →This article is from pages 533 – 537 of a book scanned and sent to me in PDF format by my good friend, Dr. John Gideon Hartnett, a professor at the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia. It proves all modern translations of the New Testament have errors and omissions because they are not based on the Textus Receptus Greek manuscript. It also shows that the statement in the New … Continue reading →
Posted on
21Most people today think of the prefix “anti-” as meaning “against,” but in context of antichrist it actually means “in place of.” Early Christians understood this word to not mean someone who sought to destroy Christ but someone who sought to set himself up in the place of Christ!
Continue reading →Posted on
5Posted on
11Yes, there is no word “trinity” found anywhere in the Bible. Instead the word, “Godhead” is used in the King James Version and a few other versions. It’s interesting that the word “Godhead” appears 3 times in the KJV! Significant, don’t you think? Acts 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, … Continue reading →
Posted on
4The answer is NO! Not according to the 1611 King James version of the English Bible! Genesis 22:2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of. The KJV says only to “offer” Isaac as a sacrifice, not … Continue reading →
