Posted on
16Modern Bible translations do not translate the prophecy of Daniel 9:27 correctly. The translators were influenced by Darby’s dispensationlism to believe the 70th Week of Daniel will be fulfilled during a 7-year period of time just before the return of Christ. This is false.
Continue reading →Bible societies were, from the beginning, infiltrated with Jesuits or Vatican sympathizers. Bible societies agreed not only to change text wording to favor unbiblical Catholic teaching, but to add in the Apocrypha whenever requested.
Continue reading →Constantin Tischendorf deceived the academic Christian world with his promotion of the corrupt Sinaiticus manuscript of the New Testament.
Continue reading →Well researched reasons why the King James Version of the Bible is the most accurate translation in English, and a shocking account of apostate Lutherans who reject it!
Continue reading →Posted on
5The Covenant of the Book of Daniel is referring to the Covenant God made with Abraham. Jesus confirmed it by preaching the Gospel of grace to the Jews.
Continue reading →Posted on
5This article lists the 8 top selling Bible translations in the USA. The KJV is ranked number 2. Do they all teach the same things about the prophecy of the 70th Week of Daniel? I consider the correct translation of Daniel 9:27 to be of utmost importance. Why? It’s because most contemporary Protestant evangelicals believe the “he” of Daniel 9:27 is the Antichrist, a secular humanist who makes an Endtime … Continue reading →
Posted on
6What the original 1611 King James Bible looked like. A friend on social media shared with me a YouTube entitled, “AV1611 The True Bible” by John Doerr. In it, Mr. Doerr says, Throughout the 1800s you’ve got a number of attacks on Scripture. The most subtle would be the change of the authorized version of 1611 by a Vatican manuscript subscribing man named Benjamin Blayney who didn’t know any Hebrew. … Continue reading →
Popular modern English Bible translations such as ASV, RSV, NIV, ESV are based on corrupt manuscripts from the Roman Catholic Church!
Continue reading →This article is from pages 533 – 537 of a book scanned and sent to me in PDF format by my good friend, Dr. John Gideon Hartnett, a professor at the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia. It proves all modern translations of the New Testament have errors and omissions because they are not based on the Textus Receptus Greek manuscript. It also shows that the statement in the New … Continue reading →
Protestant churches have been weakened through Jesuit infiltration, false doctrines, compromise with the world, and rejection of true Bible doctrines.
Continue reading →Posted on
4The answer is NO! Not according to the 1611 King James version of the English Bible! Genesis 22:2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of. The KJV says only to “offer” Isaac as a sacrifice, not … Continue reading →
