Kevin Annett’s bio.. In this interview with YouTube Shaun Attwood, Mr. Annett says he is “launching a criminal lawsuit against ‘Pope’ Leo XIV/Robert Prevost, charging him with complicity in murder, criminal conspiracy, and crimes against humanity.”

Transcription

Shaun Attwood: Good evening, everybody. I’m hugely excited to have Kevin back. He has an amazingly viral series exposing the horrors of the Vatican, the Pope and the Catholic Church.

But tonight he’s got an absolutely huge announcement that he has saved for this channel to let everybody know this news because you guys have really given him so much positive feedback, comments, support. People have bought his book and you can find the link for the books in the description. So Kevin’s really appreciative of all the support and interest that has been generated on this channel. It’s become one of the stories that has got the most interest of everything that we’re doing and we appreciate Kevin coming back so soon again and announcing this huge news. All of Kevin’s links are in the description box. And if you’ve got any questions for Kevin, please keep them within the remit of what we’re talking about. Put them in the chat. And when Kevin has announced the news and there’s various things he wants to go over first, then we will start to get the questions put to him. But I will be saving them up in the meantime.

So Kevin, what is it that you got? We’re all on tenterhooks! (The suspense is killing us!) Do you want me to get this on the screen right now?

Kevin Annett: Sure, that’d be good. It’s actually an announcement from the International Commonwealth Court of Justice. I’m an advisor to the prosecutor of the court.

And based on startling new evidence, they’re launching a criminal case against the present Pope Leo Robert Prevost. And we’ll get into that as I read that.

But I just want to say as a prelude to that, two days ago, there was an incident and this has never happened. It shows you that we have the bad guys concerned. I had just presided at a funeral of one of our people who had died. And I was standing there at the committal service in the graveyard. A limousine pulls up. Two guys get out. One of them walks over to me. This is when I was by myself after the service. And he looked vaguely familiar. I realized later he was a Knights of Columbus goon who had been in one of our church protests in Toronto. But he came to me and very quickly said,

“If you carry through with this court case, we’re going to do to you what we do to children in these ceremonies. We’re going to cut off parts of your body and you’re going to die slowly.”

He then turned around and left.

Okay, that’s never happened before face to face. And so, you know, I take it seriously enough. But as he left, I called out to him. “Don’t I know you from somewhere?” Because he definitely was one of those Knights of Columbus. These are goons that came when we were doing the church occupations in 2008 that forced out a lot of this stuff in Canada. He had been one of the people at St. Michael’s Catholic Church in downtown Toronto who had roughed up some of the people we were with.

Carrie Luster, a Mohawk woman, had gone up and seized the pulpit and began to read the crimes of the Vatican. She got punched in the stomach and dragged out. And this guy was one of the ones who did it.

Well, he was the guy who threatened me 17 years later, but I could tell it was the same guy. Unfortunately, I don’t know his name. And unfortunately, there was nobody around to record this, but it happened. And I think it’s directly related to this.

So to get into this announcement, the court has announced today that they’re beginning a criminal investigation. If you scroll down a little bit, you’ll see a picture of this young woman, Emanuela Orlandi. Scomparsa in Italian means disappeared. In 1983, she vanished. And you’ll see this in all the mainstream corporate media.

Her father had worked at the Vatican. She had a long association. As a matter of fact, if you go right down to the bottom of that press release, you’ll see a picture of her as a young girl standing in front of John Paul II, who in fact was somebody who had harmed her and was involved in this Ninth Circle trading in children.

The court announced today, based on new evidence, that they are launching this criminal investigation against the present Pope Robert Prevost based on a number of things. First of all, there are two eyewitnesses, one within the Ninth Circle, a former cult member, and a victim survivor who has come forward, who was involved in the cult. Her parents had introduced her into the cult, and she survived. She’s in hiding now somewhere in Europe.

But the investigators of the court interviewed both of these people. They both claim that the present Pope Leo was involved in these Ninth Circle ceremonies on two occasions. First of all, September 1978, the month he was ordained a priest. He was ordained in Rome, the same month that John Paul I died. Remember the Pope who was killed for investigating the Vatican Bank? He was found basically poisoned.

And then later in June 1983, he was present when this young woman, Emanuela, was brought in and harmed and abused by these Ninth Circle members, and then shipped off, they believe she was sent off to Germany to be used in their cult network, either sacrificed or used sexually, and in other ways.

So the court prosecutor, let me read out the statement from the court prosecutor.

“Apparently the new Pope Leo, Robert Prevost, was inducted into the Ninth Circle soon after his ordination as a priest in September 1998. The induction occurred at midnight on October 16, 1978, in a sub-basement catacomb beneath the Vatican.”

And I’m going to discuss where it happened because we have more evidence on that.

During that initiation, the newly appointed Pope John Paul II presided at the ritual killing, dismembering, and cannibalizing of a four-year-old Italian boy. Prevost was also present on June, as I mentioned, June 22nd, when Emanuela Orlandi was kidnapped, basically, and then circulated through their network.

Now this is important. Like every Roman pontiff, Robert Prevost was chosen as Pope from a select stable of Ninth Circle members who’ve been groomed by the cult for years and approved their loyalty to its carnage.

And the second part of this is that sources within the Vatican, once this stuff became known, they approached the court with a log. Apparently this is a log, a journal, of all the Ninth Circle ceremonies that have been held in the Vatican since 1870. And this log confirms that Prevost, the present Pope Leo, was present at these and other ceremonies in the Vatican.

Now a final point on that, if you go to the very bottom of the press release, you’ll see a schematic map of what’s underneath the Vatican. It’s part of what’s called the Vatican Grotto. These are chambers coming from the early Christian period and made into various chambers.

If you look there, scroll down a little bit, you’ll see Chamber U. That’s called the Tomb of Lucifer. And that’s where these, at least the recent Ninth Circle sacrificial ceremonies we’re talking about, took place. It’s interesting, it’s right beneath St. Peter’s Square, right where, according to legend, St. Peter was crucified upside down. And that’s significant spiritually, because it’s inverting the energy of early Christianity to capture it and control it, just like they do in these sacrificial ceremonies.

So that’s the basic press release. And the timeline on this is the court is convening in two weeks, Sunday, June 1st.

Three months later, September 1st, the court is issuing [will issue] summonses to Leo and his accomplices to be arraigned before the court. I won’t say where in Europe. And the charges will be read out and the prosecution’s case will begin on September 1st.

So that’s our basic news, but there’s other things connected to that which we should get into.

Shaun Attwood: Kevin, how easy or rather how difficult is it to serve legal papers to the Pope and these people, these higher-ups?

Keven Annett It’s been done before. Don’t forget, I mean, under their statutes, they can’t be prosecuted. But under international law, they can be. He can be prosecuted as flesh and blood. And the common law principle, going back to before Magna Carta, says, be you ever so high, you are not above the law. So under international law, he can be tried as a man. And they don’t have the right to refuse sheriffs from an international court who will be issuing them.

Don’t forget, when you serve something, you don’t have to be served in person. I mean, I’ve had this happen to me. All you have to do is nail the summons on the door of the Vatican or stand there with a video camera and say, we are serving the Pope here. He served, bang. And they wouldn’t want that kind of bad publicity, which is, I think, one of the reasons they want to shut this thing down before it gets to September, right?

Shaun Attwood: Indeed, yes. So does this mean that people will be arrested and there will be summonses?

Keven Annett Yep. We already have common law sheriffs from the first case and in subsequent years. We’re also going to go to Interpol and deputize them. We want to have deputized Interpol agents and even the Roman police to accompany us when we film this, when we do all this.

And yeah, they have the right. If they’re summoned, they’re usually given either 48 hours or seven days to respond, to come to the arraignment, which is when the charges are read out and they have to plead. If they don’t, they can be arrested for evading illegal summons.

And don’t forget Ratzinger stepped down when the Spanish government threatened to have him arrested when he came to Spain, when they looked at the docket of evidence we have on him.

So he’s vulnerable. I think that’s why these threats are intensifying.

I’m an advisor to the prosecutor’s office. I’m also the North American field secretary, but you know, it’s one of the reasons I’m coming to Europe in the fall to work with the court.

Shaun Attwood: So how long has this court been around and, you know, what kind of successes has it achieved in the past?

Keven Annett If folks remember, we formed the International Tribunal of Crimes of Church and State in Dublin in the summer of 2010. That’s after I got locked out of Canada when the Canadian government and churches did their cover-up and spin operation. Suddenly I was banned. I couldn’t be quoted in the press anymore.

So right at that time, I was invited over to Europe by Irish survivors of the church of Rome. And we set up this tribunal and it spread quickly to nine countries and it formed the common law court of justice that brought the first case against Queen Elizabeth and Joe Ratzinger and, you know, a.k.a. Pope Benedict that caused, you know, his resignation. He hid out in the Vatican till the day he died so he wouldn’t be arrested.

So it’s a bonafide court of record. Any citizen in the world can set up these courts. Any group of citizens can set up what are called tribunals of conscience if the courts and the government are implicated in these crimes, which we know they are.

So it gives us tremendous power and we’re hoping these things can be a springboard for people to set up in their own communities these investigations and not wait for others, you know, like me to do it. We’ve shown that this works and so that should be kind of a green light for folks.

Shaun Attwood: So the Vatican is worth so much money, there’s so much vested interest and you are kind of like rocking that boat. Aren’t you afraid? You have told us about the assassins, the intelligence, the police. They’re a law unto themselves, and any entity with that amount of money can pretty much have someone eliminated. Are you taking extra extra caution or?

Keven Annett Well, yeah, we have certain kind of protocols we follow but, you know, if they want to kill you, they’ll kill you and their their main ally is not the cop out there but the cop in your head. He’s telling you don’t do this, you know, something might happen to you.

I passed that long ago where I was self-concerned in that way because I realized because it can happen to any of us at any time, not just from a killer but fate, you know, we could drop dead from a stroke tomorrow. You have only this moment and if you stay focused on that, it’s very difficult for them to stop one person, let alone a whole group of people working together on this stuff.

The difficulty I’ve found is that people aren’t coming together on this and they’re not stepping up and taking these actions. That’s the real enemy, not these turkeys in Rome who are helpless. If we all stood together and took action, they would fall tomorrow and I have to keep that in mind all the time and I’m thinking all the time of those children right now who are being carved up and like a side of beef by these people and used and and killed.

So they want to take me and cut my nose and ears off. Well, so what? So I’m dead. The point is others have to carry this on and that’s the point we keep trying to get people to move from that fear and self-concern mode into we’re not going to be stopped. No, like a mother, the mother’s instinct or the father’s instinct to protect their children, it’s inherent in us. We need to tap into that and we’ll be unbeatable.

(Shaun Attwood reads the indictment against Robert Prevost.)

Shaun Attwood: So, we’ve probably got a lot of people on here, Kevin, who are not familiar with the Ninth Circle. I know you’ve explained it several times, but could you just explain it one more time, please?

Keven Annett: Yeah, it’s formed, we believe, by the Jesuits in the 16th century. It’s a child sacrifice cult, operates within the Catholic Church, it’s inter-generational, so there’s prominent families who are part of this, they raise their children in it, usually sacrifice their firstborn in order to, move up the hierarchy of the cult. And it operates also as a blackmailing agency. We’ve had survivors like Toos Nijenhuis and Anne Marie van Blijenburgh say that they were. Anne Marie was a lawyer who was brought to what she was told was going to be a dinner, turns out they were sacrificing and killing a child there, and, they blackmailed her and controlled her that way.

So it has political purposes and spiritual ones. You’ve talked about this kind of energy vampirism, but also it’s very lucrative. It’s part of the human trafficking network all over the planet the Catholic Church is embedded in and profits hugely from. Again, I mentioned that in my book, Dethroning Rogue Power. We’ve sold over 700 copies of this in this month alone, if you can believe it, so it’s been a huge success. So that’s kind of in a nutshell what the Ninth Circle is all about.

The date 1870, I don’t know, many people know this, but that year, the Pope in Rome declared himself infallible, which means he’s incapable of error. He kind of one-upped God, right? He said, I’m incapable of error, right? That year Garibaldi had overthrown the Vatican, basically. The Vatican didn’t exist until Mussolini reestablished it in 1929. But he got the guarantee, everyone in the church suddenly believed he was infallible.

So that obviously encouraged them to say, okay, we can go ahead with these Ninth Circle ceremonies, come out of the closet, because I can’t be touched now. And we think it’s definitely correlated. But the interesting thing, Sean, they have a log about all these ceremonies.

And we’ve apparently, it’s a very old form of Latin and still being translated, but we have already found the name of this guy, Prevost, already in here at these two ceremonies we mentioned. So, in court, this is almost irrefutable evidence, including with the eyewitnesses.

Shaun Attwood: So Angelique wants to know, is that the tomb they opened at Christmas?

Keven Annett: No, this is something else. As a matter of fact, don’t forget, anything you see in the press, it’s being swabbed. A couple of things on this, you mentioned, like in the press release, there’s a stable of safe names who can be chosen as Pope. They do this in any election with any government too. Call it a red list. Safe people are on a red list. Unacceptable candidates are on a black list and they can never be elected. But the safe people are on a red list. And those are the candidates you can choose. Whether it’s Trump, Biden, Robert Prevost, they’re all safe.

In the papacy, you’re on the red list if you participate in the Ninth Circle. And then it doesn’t matter who you elect, you’re elected in the Ninth Circle. And, so that’s one of the damning features of this, where it condemns the whole institution, not just bad apples, right? That’s the good part.

Shaun Attwood: So Annie’s wondering whether these Ninth Circle events coincide with Davos events or political get-togethers. I imagine there’s more history in the timings of the Ninth Circle than these contemporary political events, isn’t there, Kevin?

Keven Annett: Oh, yeah. Yeah, it goes back centuries. And it’s based, of course, on an ancient Roman sacrificial cult. We’ve talked about that before, where the Romans would sacrifice children for the crops, in early spring and that. So, I mean, these are old practices, but they have a whole aspect here where they’ve got a lot of political and financial power behind them, too.

We talked in the last show about China, China’s role in all this, and the importance of the Vatican Bank in shifting the world’s finances towards the east to the Chinese sphere. So that all comes into this as well.

Shaun Attwood: Now, the Pope, if he gets served, is he just likely to ignore this and just hope it goes away? Is that the strategy that these Popes have taken in the past?

Keven Annett: Well, it’s a dumb strategy, because what that does under law is you’re not contesting what’s being said about you. It’s how King Charles I in England had his head chopped off. He refused to plead. So the parliamentary court said, okay, you’re not contesting what we’re saying about you. You waged a war of tyranny against your own people.

If Prevost doesn’t contest what we’re charging him openly with, that he’s involved in these nefarious murderous activities, then it’s a tacit admission of guilt. And in a lot of court trials, criminal court trials, at that point he can be found immediately guilty as charged and sentenced. So they’re caught between a rock and a hard place. If they ignore it, they’re admitting to it. If they don’t ignore it and respond, they’re admitting to the legitimacy of our court and they have to be involved in it. So it’s a win-win for us. And that’s why we keep saying to people, take these actions and you’ll see the kind of power you have.

Shaun Attwood: A few people are asking for details of what’s in the diary of the Ninth Circle events, but we’ve got to be very careful, Kevin, with our language, what we say online. (Because of YouTube censorship.)

Keven Annett: I just want to make a point legally about that. You know, in the US Constitution, First Amendment, they talk about “prior restraint”, which means nobody can tell somebody what to say or how to phrase it in a legal context. If they try to do that, whoever is imposing these censorship rules on what happens on YouTube or whatever, they have to come into court and show just cause why they’re telling people not to use certain words. I don’t think they want that. And you can’t be shut down for using certain words. It’s called prior restraint. It’s against the law to do that. And they only do it because they think people will be intimidated and start cooperating. We can’t censor our words. That’s what people are under tyranny, that’s the first step towards tyranny, not saying things as they are.

Like in my work in Canada early on, these places, these death camps were called residential schools. Well, they weren’t schools. They were places where children were dying and being killed. So, nobody ever sued me over that. In 30 years, I’ve never been sued for using those words in Canada.

So why would it happen to you? If their lawyers and censors are listening to this right now, they know very well that it’s true, what I’m saying, and they’re not going to come down. They just rely on people’s fear to cooperate.

So I’m not telling you what to do and not to do, Shaun. I’m just, I feel the need to share that with people because it’s a fundamental issue of our right to say things as they are.

Shaun Attwood: Yeah, I agree with all of that, but I’ve lost the channel twice and it’s not people. It’s AI. So AI is watching every single word. And when certain words cross thresholds, it shuts you down. That’s the modern world we’re in.

Keven Annett: Yeah. Temporarily, they can shut you down. But at some point, whoever owns that AI would have to appear in a court of law and show why they did that.

Now, you always have to weigh what you’re going to lose in the short run with what you can lose. You know, I mean, I’ve been shut down so often, but I’m still here. And by being shut down, I became more popular and people are saying, what’s going on with this guy? You know, Shaun, you might get more followers by being shut down. But I feel the need to say that. I never tell people what to do or say, but I’m just letting you know lawfully we’re standing on solid ground.

Shaun Attwood: So who was Emanuela Orlandi?

Keven Annett: It got a lot of media exposure back in the eighties, her brother, Paolo, he’s led this campaign for many years. Her dad worked in the Vatican. She went to a music lesson somewhere in the Vatican and she just vanished June 22nd, 1983. It was solstice, summer solstice, which is not surprising. That’s a satanic high point.

And for years, the Vatican put up this thing saying, “Oh, we don’t know where she is. We’re searching for her,” a typical kind of spin and fog operation.

But the court investigators have spoken to the eyewitness who saw Robert Prevost at the ceremony, along with the Ninth Circle insider who confirmed, the second eyewitness confirmed that, yes, he was at this, where these things happened to her. And she was then sent to Germany, they believe. We’re communicating all that to her brother and to the campaign in Italy.

But it got enormous spread. It still does. If you look it up online, you’ll see, about that, about her.

Shaun Attwood: Yeah. I mean, the Marquis de Sade, he wrote about these extremely wealthy people in Europe in castles and stuff who would just snatch kids and do all kinds of horrific things to them. So, you know.

Keven Annett: I also mentioned about where this is happening in the Vatican. It’s called the Tomb of Lucifer, but where it is, I don’t know if like in Rome, you’ve got the St. Peter’s Square, this kind of circular thing, and there’s an obelisk. That obelisk is supposed to be where they crucified Peter, the disciple, who they claim was the first pope, which is nonsense, but they say that Peter was crucified upside down, right on that spot. What was interesting, that’s where I conducted the exorcism, October 11, 2009, where the tornado hit the next day, and then all this news hit the media about this, right on the same spot.

I didn’t even know I was being led there. I just stood there, and it shows you at that spot, it’s an energy vortex, and they’re using it, you can invert the inversion, you can, so it’s all kind of centered there, and what’s interesting is this U on the map, the tomb of Lucifer, right beneath where they supposedly crucified Peter.

It was only excavated in 1940 by this Pope Pius XII. Now, he’s the one who recognized the Nazi regime, and they recognized each other. This is 1940 to 49, and there’s stories about how the Nazis were always looking for these arcane relics to tap into the demonic energy related. It’s interesting, that’s when this Pius XII, the pro-Nazi pope, authorized the excavations that opened up this tomb of Lucifer, where they now conduct the Ninth Circle ceremony, so I don’t think that’s accidental.

Shaun Attwood: So what about Emanuela’s parents in this, what’s the deal there?

Keven Annett: Oh, they were bribed into silence, or bribed into going along with the official line, which is, we don’t know where she is, but the church is looking for her, and we pray for her safety, blah blah blah.

You know, I mean, I’ve had the same experience working with indigenous families who had their kids, done away with or whatever. They were told, they were approached by the church and said, you’re going to face a lot of trouble if you talk about this, and they go along with it. Even when that happened to our friends in our movement, their families all said the same thing.

So, when people are by themselves, on their own, they feel helpless, and they feel they have to go along, but what we’re doing with these court trials is to show no you’re not alone, and you can take action, and we hope it’s kind of a rallying and encouragement for people in that situation.

Shaun Attwood: So was that out of fear, or did they get paid off, or both?

Keven Annett: All of the above. Everyone has a weakness, they look for it, they press. Some people can’t be, and then they kill them. You know, whatever. It’s just, the story. I mean, we all know the world, the way it is.

I just remembered something connected to that, the Chamber of Lucifer that I mentioned, and the Nazi involvement. It’s a little known fact that Pope Benedict and Pope John Paul II in the picture there were both members in Germany and in Poland of what’s called the Knights of Darkness, which was an SS demonic cult. They would go into these concentration camps and get people and use them in their ceremonies, the SS Knights of Darkness. And it’s not accidental that these guys are very prominent in the Ninth Circle as well.

So we’ve got a lot of this categorized. It’s going to be in the prosecutor’s report. We’re going to send out summaries of this over the summer before the trial begins.

Shaun Attwood: So, physically, then, where will the trial be held? Which jurisdiction, which country?

Keven Annett: It has international jurisdiction. We don’t want to say where it’s going to be held at this point. When we first did that, there was a bad repercussion. But it has international jurisdiction. Common law has universal jurisdiction, which means you can hold it anywhere and it’s just as binding. But there will obviously be local actions happening in Italy, Brussels, where some of the legal advisors operate out of.

And we want to encourage people in any country to hold their own investigations, hold their own actions at churches to bring this out. People in those pews who are giving the money need to know these facts. So really urge people to write to us and get involved in this campaign. There’s a lot people can do on the ground to further the work of the court.

Shaun Attwood: So you started out talking about the threat to your life that you received this week. What about the other people involved in the court? Have they been through anything?

Keven Annett: Well, in the past, we’ve had investigators disappear altogether. One of the people I knew in Europe, he just vanished, never found him. Witnesses go missing or suddenly drop out or certainly start bad-mouthing us, in the typical manner you find with native people in Canada, who suddenly said, “Oh, I never gave Kevin my testimony. He’s making all that up.”

You know, the best way to stop something is to discredit it, not to start piling up bodies, because that brings attention. You want to bribe and convince people to change their stories on that, to say, “See, Kevin was just making it all up. It’s all about him and his ego.”

I mean, that’s what people are prone to believe anyway. People tend to want to look for that shady aspect. We live in a very cynical age, right? And people are prone to believe the worst about somebody. So it works most of the time.

But yeah, the fellow I was with, who is kind of my bodyguard, I don’t like having a bodyguard, but he insists. He’s ex-military, actually. He kind of follows me around. He was off at the cemetery. That’s why he wasn’t there. He would have taken these guys down. But they were watching us, obviously, and they waited till when I was alone and came over and thought, they know it’s not going to stop me, but they also know that I’m going to share the story and they hope it will intimidate people and encourage other people in the court, not to want to carry on.

But you can just do so much and then they’re powerless. And that’s why this is like planting seeds everywhere. We know the seeds will grow and they can’t stamp them all out, right?

Shaun Attwood: J.D. wants to know, why is this case being going on for so long and not had Leo in court already?

Keven Annett: Well, a couple of reasons on that. We just recently discovered that there’s this kind of red list of acceptable candidates for the papacy and that his name was on this Vatican, document from since 1870, listing all the Pope’s involvement. So once he got elected and we found this stuff, that’s when the court decided to move on this particular individual to show the bigger aspect of this, right? How it’s organized. These people are chosen 50 years in advance. There’s this young priest who is willing to take part in these things and say, OK, put him on the red list. He’s a future Pope, right?

Just to show people how the system works. But from the beginning, ever since our first court case in 2012, we said all along that it isn’t about the individuals, although in common law you have to indict individuals. It’s about a whole system, a whole history. The Vatican wouldn’t be able to get away with this unless they had billions of dollars every year. So you’re up against a formidable enemy. And we have just so many resources, right? So you can’t do everything.

You know, people are saying, “Kevin, why don’t you go arrest the guy?” Right. Who me personally? It requires that we reach kind of a critical mass of awareness and then police and others will come forward as they have done in the past.

Shaun Attwood: Right. Next question is from Kelly: “How much weight, if any, will this trial hold, and what outcome do you hope to achieve?”

Keven Annett: We hope to achieve the end of the Vatican and the disestablishment of this criminal institution. That’ll take many years. This is another nail in the coffin.

The power of the of the court is tremendous. Yet why do you think Ratzinger stepped down? Not only Ratzinger, but three other cardinals named in the indictment in 2012 all resigned, including the head of the Jesuits, Adolfo Nicolás Pachón.

So it has tremendous power, but unfortunately, by staying on the mainstream stuff, you’re always being brainwashed to think that power means you see a lot of cops go in there and take somebody down, or, like that’s not how a system, disintegrates. It’s disintegrating now as we speak, the Catholic Church, because of all of these revelations, you go to a Catholic Church in a place like Quebec, which is our Ireland or Italy, and there’s 10 people sitting in the pews on a Sunday morning. People are voting with their feet on this and it’s because of all of this work we’ve been doing and not stopping.

Shaun Attwood: So people are asking, why isn’t this already on the web? Because Kevin has decided to announce this this evening, and I’ll put the link for the announcement in the live chat, there it is, it’s in the live chat, so if people want to read that. And murderbydecree.com, International Court to investigate, it’s and I’ll put it in the description box as well.

Question from the Trackmaster Man: Why have the FBI not just shut this whole religion down? It’s painstakingly obvious what’s going on, and yet they re-elect a new pope and carry on. Surely there has to be an end.” Isn’t it out of the jurisdiction of the FBI? Because it’s a law unto itself, the Vatican, isn’t it?

Keven Annett: They like to create that impression, but no, the Vatican, like in every country in America, the Vatican is a subversive power. It operates outside the laws of America. It’s got its own law, claims its own jurisdiction.

When children are harmed, they’re told to disobey the child protection laws of their own country. That’s intruding on the sovereignty and the laws of America. Why wouldn’t that power be disestablished and stop from operating in America if they were a sovereign nation? So this is about fundamental questions of justice and the lives of children and sovereignty of nations, the rule of law, the separation of the church and state.

My question is, why do people stand by and let it happen? Why? I mean, if there’s an issue that would mobilize people, you think it’d be what happens to children, their lives, right? But no, I mean, that’s the degree to which people have been emotionally numbed and mentally numbed. And that’s one of the reasons we do these campaigns, is to spark life again in people, to say, look at this big death we’re part of, right? It kills minds and hearts and souls, not just bodies. And we’ve got to break out of that and have a future. So that’s kind of the bigger issue here.

Shaun Attwood: Was Trudeau, former PM, a professed Jesuit?

Keven Annett: He wasn’t just professed, he was raised by Jesuit teachers, as was his father, Pierre. It’s one of the reasons that we believe one of the Trudeau sons who died in a, “skiing accident,” you sacrifice one of your children in the cult, right? It’s a sign of a cultic involvement.